It was very interesting to see
the differences between how I perceive myself and my leadership reputation and
how others do. The three people I chose were two of my close friends and my
older sister, all of whom know me rather well. However, their responses were
significantly different than both how I perceived myself and how I thought
others perceived me. Many of the flaws and things that I could work on that I
thought were apparent to everyone were not perceived by my friends and sister.
I believe that one of the reasons for this is that one of my strengths is being
deliberative. Since I tend to be careful with both my words and actions, I
usually do not show chinks in my leadership armor, so to speak. Another
potential reason is that we tend to be harsher critics of ourselves than of
others. While it is probably true that I am occasionally egotistical or
pessimistic, the people close to me realize that those characteristics are not
emblematic of my leadership style. Alternately, I had never really thought of
myself as something like “committed to a common vision” until one of my friends
brought up several instances in which I fit exactly that description. This
exercise made me realize that my idea of how others perceive me is not
necessarily how others actually perceive me. Of course some of the traits lined
up, such as intelligent, well informed, or sarcastic, but many of my ideas on
how others perceived me came from how I perceive myself. This lets me know that
I should strive to get more feedback in both a professional and personal
environment, so that I can both better myself as a leader and have a better
idea as to how others perceive me as a leader and as a friend.
Sunday, March 8, 2015
Monday, March 2, 2015
Post #4
The identity
that I find myself most aware of on a daily basis is my race. Although my
parents were both born in India, I was born here. This has often left me
feeling in some sort of in-between state: not Indian enough for Indian people
but not white enough for white people. This element of my identity has probably
been most crucial to my development. I went to a high school with an
overwhelming white majority, which caused me to hide the more “Indian” parts of
myself. Some people referred to me as “the whitest Indian they knew”, which
wasn’t an unfair descriptor at the time. It was only after I came to college
that I was able to embrace my entire identity, both Indian and American. The
identity that I feel provides me with the most privilege is being male. Hearing
stories from female friends or my sisters about being harassed or not taken seriously
has made me realize how much more valued masculinity is in American culture
than femininity. On the other hand, being non-white in a white culture has
denied me of some privilege. I believe that privilege plays some role in daily
interactions with others, but not as big of a role as it does in the working
world. In college, quite a few people are from approximately the same type of
background. This is even truer if you begin to hang out with people in the same
major, or working at the same co-op, or who have the same interests. However,
after college I feel that privilege will definitely play a larger role in the
everyday conversations that I have with other people. People tend to jump to
snap judgments about others, and from that dynamic it is easy to see that
privilege will play a role in everyday interactions, especially with strangers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)